Tom 21 Nr 2 (2024)
Artykuły

The Genesis of a Manifold with Boundary: A Model of the Archytas Paradox

PDF (Angielski)
  • Jon Pérez Laraudogoitia
Jon Pérez Laraudogoitia
University of the Basque Country

Opublikowane 30.11.2024

Słowa kluczowe

  • Archytas Paradox,
  • Archytas force,
  • bounded Euclidean space,
  • manifold with boundary,
  • non-rectifiable line,
  • spatial edge
    • ...More
    Less

Prawa autorskie (c) 2025 Filozoficzne Aspekty Genezy

Creative Commons License

Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne 4.0 Międzynarodowe.

Jak cytować

Jon Pérez Laraudogoitia, The Genesis of a Manifold with Boundary: A Model of the Archytas Paradox, Filozoficzne Aspekty Genezy 2024, vol. 21, no. 2 https://doi.org/10.53763/fag.2024.21.2.241

Abstrakt

A geometrical model of cosmos is proposed whereby Archytas’ argument against the existence of an “edge of the heaven” does not work. The model, based on the solution to a previous paradox concerning non-rectifiable lines, demonstrates the possibility of a finite and bounded Euclidean space and reveals the purely geometrical origin of certain forces present therein.

PDF (Angielski)

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Bibliografia

  1. Aristotle, Physics, Book IV, 212b5–10, in: Richard McKeon (ed.), The Basic Works of Aristotle, Random House, New York 1941, pp. 269–302.
  2. Belot Gordon, Geometric Possibility, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199595327.001.0001
  3. Cao Tian Yu, Conceptual Developments of 20th Century Field Theories, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1997. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511563997
  4. Cini Enrico and Fano Vicenzo, Careful With Those Scissors, Eugene! Against the Observational Indistinguishability of Spacetimes, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 2021, Vol. 89, pp. 103–113, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2021.07.007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2021.07.007
  5. Curiel Erik, Singularities and Black Holes, in: Edward N. Zalta and Uri Nodelman (eds.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Summer 2023 Edition, https://tiny.pl/yxr9rnfv [14.04.2025].
  6. Esposito Giampiero, Kamenshchik Alexander Yu., and Pollifrone Giuseppe, Euclidean Quantum Gravity on Manifolds with Boundary, Springer, Dordrecht 1997, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5806-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5806-0
  7. Frankel Theodore, The Geometry of Physics: An Introduction, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2004.
  8. Gilmore Cody, Calosi Claudio, and Costa Damiano, Location and Mereology, in: Edward N. Zalta and Uri Nodelman (eds.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Spring 2024 Edition, https://tiny.pl/q2h0mb_4 [14.04.2025].
  9. Huffman Carl, Archytas, in: Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Summer 2018 Edition, https://tiny.pl/rm64s9jb [14.04.2025].
  10. Huggett Nick, Everywhere and Everywhen: Adventures in Physics and Philosophy, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195379518.001.0001
  11. Johnson Monte Ransome, Sources for the Philosophy of Archytas, Ancient Philosophy 2008, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp. 173–199, https://doi.org/10.5840/ancientphil20082819. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/ancientphil20082819
  12. Le Poidevin Robin, Travels in Four Dimensions: The Enigmas of Space and Time, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198752547.001.0001
  13. Martin Gottfried, Kant’s Metaphysics and Theory of Science, Manchester University Press, Manchester 1955.
  14. Nerlich Graham, The Shape of Space, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2009.
  15. Norton John D., Why Thought Experiments do not Transcend Empiricism, in: Christopher Hitchcock (ed.), Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Science, Blackwell Publishing, Malden 2004, pp. 44–66.
  16. Petersen Mark A., Dante and the 3-sphere, American Journal of Physics 1979, Vol. 47, No. 12, pp. 1031–1035, https://doi.org/10.1119/1.11968. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1119/1.11968
  17. Priest Graham, Beyond the Limits of Thought, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1995.
  18. Rovelli Carlo, Some Considerations on Infinity in Physics, in: Michael Heller and Hugh W. Woodin, Infinity: New Research Frontiers, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2011, pp. 167–175. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511976889.009
  19. Rucker Rudy, Infinity and the Mind: The Science and Philosophy of the Infinite, Princeton University Press, Princeton 1995.
  20. Schlesinger George N., The Power of Thought Experiments, Foundations of Physics 1996, Vol. 26, No. 4, pp. 467–482, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02071216. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02071216
  21. Sorabji Richard, Matter, Space and Motion: Theories in Antiquity and Their Sequel, Duckworth, London 1988.
  22. Sorensen Roy A., Thought Experiments, Oxford University Press, Oxford 1999. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/019512913X.001.0001
  23. Varzi Achille C., Spatial Reasoning and Ontology: Parts, Whole, and Locations, in: Marco Aiello, Ian E. Pratt-Hartman, and Johan F.A.K. van Benthem (eds.), Handbook of Spatial Logics, Springer, Dordrecht 2007, pp. 945–1038, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5587-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5587-4_15
  24. Vilenkin Naum Ya., In Search of Infinity, Birkhäuser, Boston 1995. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-0837-2
  25. Weber Zach, At the Limits of Thought, in: Can Baskent and Thomas Macaulay Ferguson (eds.), Graham Priest on Dialetheism and Paraconsistency, Springer, Switzerland 2019, pp. 555–574, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25365-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25365-3_26
  26. Weeks Jeffrey R., The Shape of Space, CRC Press – Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton 2020.